food or energy?

i am no fan of UPA coalition, that too for no apparent reason but i anyways am in favour of the nuclear deal. i mean i don't want india to be part of the sissy foundation but till russia becomes the superpower again, we have to get into some kind of fraternity. and going by the looks of it, g w bush led self-destructible group is the most favorable one now.

so the other day i was listening to the statements of this half-dead leader of left who was saying people of india need food and not atom bomb (btw, bombs are not the only implementation of the nuclear energy - electricity is too). politically very correct statement, i would say. but would anyone like to ask that idiot that if all the bangladeshis who are infiltrating the country, under his party's aegis, are shitting the overground water unusable then you need to use the underground water for irrigation which needs some kind of electricity to be pumped out. and no irrigation means no grain and so on and so forth.

but (sadly for the country) i guess these are just political games. left leaders would run faster than saurav dada does for his hundredth run at the lords to sign it if they are promised (highly lucrative) cabinet seats (such as home ministry and infrastructure) in lieu of signing the deal.